'I Never Betrayed My
Country'
"Prabowo Subianto
is blamed for the violence surrounding the fall
of Indonesia's Suharto. Now the former general
tells his story"
By JOSE MANUEL TESORO.
Articles and Photos courtesy of Asiaweek
Magazine
THE
RESIGNATION
The trickle of calls for change was quickly
turning into a torrent. Factions of the ruling
party, retired generals - all began demanding
the president's resignation. On the 15th, NU
leaders delivered a five-point statement. One
point underlined their respect for Suharto's
attitude in Egypt, where he had said: "If
I am no longer trusted, I will become a pandito
[wise man]." The NU response was a diplomatic
way of saying that they, too, believed his time
was over.
Prabowo had spent most of the weekend, from
the 15th to the 17th, at Kostrad HQ handling
his troops. On the evening of Saturday, the
16th, a friend showed Prabowo a copy of what
appeared to be a press statement from armed
forces headquarters supporting NU's stance.
Prabowo went straight to the president. "Sir,
this means the military is asking you to step
down!" he says he told Suharto.
The president asked his son-in-law to check
with Subagyo. Prabowo says the army chief told
him he had not known of this position. Both
generals reported to Suharto. Early in the morning
of the 17th, military headquarters retracted
the statement before it was published in most
papers. According to Prabowo, later that morning,
Wiranto arrived at Cendana to insist that he,
too, could not have known about the statement.
I obtained a copy of this release, which is
dated May 16. It has neither an official signature
nor letterhead of the armed forces. To understand
its existence, I met Brig.-Gen. A. Wahab Mokodongan,
armed forces spokesman in May 1998. He confirmed
that the military had to pull it back, but claimed
he did not know where it came from. After a
late-night press conference, he says, he was
surprised to find it in his photocopies. When
he informed Wiranto, the armed forces chief
ordered an investigation. Mokodongan says intelligence
checked computers throughout the sprawling military
headquarters complex. "There was nothing
like this," he says.
We spoke to three Indonesian journalists who
covered the 1998 events. Two remembered that
they had received the statement at Mokodongan's
press conference. (One recalled him reading
it out.) Another believes her magazine had even
been faxed it by Mokodongan's office. Its provenance
thus remains hidden. How could a statement so
sensitive appear without the knowledge of the
spokesman or the chief of the armed forces?
On the 18th, Prabowo met Rais. The oppositionist,
recalls Prabowo, told him: "I think the
situation is now untenable. I think you should
convince Pak Harto to resign." But Prabowo
was simply not in that position. At Cendana
that evening, he says he saw Wiranto, who informed
him the children wanted to fight. "How
can we?" cried Prabowo. That day, Rais
had issued a call for a demonstration to be
held May 20 at the National Monument (Monas).
Preventing the protest, which was expected to
draw thousands, might result in more martyrs.
Prabowo next saw Suharto's eldest daughter
Siti Hardiyanti Rukmana a.k.a Tutut. Prabowo
says she asked him what their next move should
be. "My advice," he says, "was
that you must replace Wiranto or put in an emergency
decree. Suharto did not want to [do either].
So I said: 'What other way is there?'"
Tutut asked Prabowo, what happens if her father
steps down? Prabowo says he responded: Constitutionally,
Habibie steps up.
The direct call for Suharto to resign came
that same day. At about 3:00 p.m. on May 18,
as the parliament building filled up with student
demonstrators, MPR chief Harmoko asked for Suharto's
resignation. Late that evening, Wiranto declared
in front of a packed press conference that Harmoko's
statement was "an individual opinion."
As for the students' presence in parliament,
early the previous evening Wiranto had met a
group that included University of Indonesia
alumni leader Hariadi Darmawan. They confirmed
that students were planning to march to parliament,
and discussed the best way to prevent possible
riots. Someone suggested that the students be
guarded by the military, or brought in by vehicles.
The next morning, says Jakarta commander Syafrie,
he was instructed by two of Wiranto's aides
to prepare transportation. At around 10 a.m.,
he says, he was also informed that the MPR leadership
had given permission for students to enter.
The students refused most of the military's
vehicles, but as long as the students came on
wheels Syafrie guaranteed they had an unobstructed
journey to parliament.
The following day, May 19, Prabowo participated
wholly in efforts to secure Monas from Rais's
planned protest. That night, Wiranto met the
senior command to discuss the demonstration.
"The meeting chaired by Wiranto said the
order was to prevent the march at all costs,"
recalls Prabowo. "I asked many times what
this means. Do we use live bullets? He did not
want to give a clear answer." Through the
night, Rais received emissaries sent to persuade
him to call off the demonstration. He finally
caved in and the feared march never happened.
But on May 20, Suharto received two blows. Fourteen
of his ministers resigned from the cabinet.
And he received one refusal after another from
those invited to join a "Reform Committee."
After sunset, Prabowo visited Habibie: "I
mentioned to him: Sir, the old man might step
down. Are you ready? He was, you know, yes,
yes, yes. I said: You must prepare yourself."
From Habibie's house, Prabowo returned to Cendana.
"Once it was clear everything was safe,
I walked in, still in my camouflage," he
says. "I was thinking I might get a pat
on the back: Successfully prevented the demonstrations.
No more killings. No more martyrs. Soldiers
under discipline. Syafrie did a good job. And
then, wham!"
In an inner room, says Prabowo, sat the Suharto
clan with Wiranto. The first to emerge was Siti
Hutami Endang Adiningsih, Suharto's youngest
daughter. Prabowo recalls: "Mamiek sees
me, then points a finger about one inch from
my nose and said: 'You traitor! Penkhianat!'
And then: 'Jangan injak kakimu di rumah saya
lagi. Don't set foot in my house again.' So
I went out. I waited. I wanted to come in. I
said I need my explanation. There was my wife,
crying." Prabowo went home.
The next day, May 21, at 9:05 a.m., abandoned
by his parliament and his cabinet, Suharto resigned
after 32 years as president. His short resignation
speech was broadcast to the nation. In spite
of his humiliation the previous night at Cendana,
Prabowo still attended the May 21 ceremony,
he says, to lend moral support to Suharto's
successor, Habibie. After Habibie took his oath,
Wiranto strode up to pledge that he and the
armed forces would protect Suharto and his family.
When the First Family departed for Cendana,
Prabowo followed. "I went just to comfort
Pak Harto," he says. "But of course
I was there already under accusation of being
the traitor. The situation was very, very tense
between me and the other children. Later my
wife told me there were reports I was having
meetings with Habibie every night. I [met] Gus
Dur, Amien Rais, Buyung Nasution. But we were
not coordinating the downfall of Suharto. We
were [discussing] the best way to calm down
this violence." Suharto did not answer
Asiaweek's request to respond to Prabowo's assertions.
THE REMOVAL
Habibie was now president. At 4.00 on May 21,
Prabowo met his friend to congratulate him.
"He kissed me on my cheeks," says
Prabowo, who asked for an appointment that evening.
Late that night, Prabowo arrived at Habibie's
home, accompanied by Kopassus chief Muchdi.
Since Wiranto might stay on as defense minister,
Prabowo says he suggested that army chief Subagyo
be made armed forces boss to prevent too much
power in a single person. That move also made
Prabowo the best candidate to succeed Subagyo.
"Yes, I was trying to influence [Habibie],"
Prabowo admits. "I was close to him!"
At no point, says Prabowo, did he threaten the
new president. Afterwards, he went back to Kostrad
headquarters.
The next day, May 22, after Friday prayers,
Prabowo's phone rang. Kostrad's flag had been
requested by army headquarters. Prabowo recalls,
"They're asking for my flag. That means
they want to replace me." He hurried back
to Kostrad. "I remember Habibie saying:
'Prabowo, whenever you're in doubt, come to
me anytime and don't think about protocol.'
I knew this guy for many years. I felt, okay,
I'll look for Habibie. He's in the palace. So
I went there."
He arrived in the early afternoon, in a convoy
of three Land Rovers carrying staff and bodyguards."[We]
went in," Prabowo says. "It was very
tense. The presidential bodyguards were looking
at me with strange faces. I think it was reported
I was going to attack or something. I met the
aide-de-camp and said: I need to see Pak Habibie.
I just want 10 minutes. I just want to ask him
a question. It is very important for me."
Before entering Habibie's office, Prabowo says
he removed his pistol "because this is
procedure. Whenever you come to a senior officer,
you have to leave all weapons behind. I was
not disarmed." Then he walked into the
president's office. "He kissed me on both
cheeks," says Prabowo. "I said: Sir,
did you know I was going to be replaced today?
'Yes, yes, yes,' he said. 'Your father-in-law
asked me to replace you. It's best. If you resign
from the army, I'll make you ambassador to the
United States.' That's what he said." Prabowo
says he was stunned. "My God, what is this?"
he recalls thinking. "In my mind, [Habibie]
was still at the time fond of me, but he was
being fooled. I went to Subagyo. On my way in,
I met some generals who were my supporters.
Their message was: Let's have a confrontation.
I said: Just keep quiet. I met Muchdi there.
We said: We are willing to step aside, but give
us some time, so that the perception is that
change of command is something normal. I think
Subagyo went over to Wiranto. Wiranto said:
No, [it] must be today."
THE "MASTERMIND"
Even after being cast out by his in-laws, tossed
aside by his ally and fired by his rival, the
worst had not yet begun for Prabowo. In the
following months, officers supposedly close
to him were transferred or removed from active
service. On June 25, Wiranto relieved Syafrie
of the Jakarta garrison command, the beginning
of a wide-ranging military reshuffle. After
the findings of the honor council, Kopassus
head Muchdi and a Kopassus colonel were released
from active duty.
Added to this were the unstoppable rumors that
Prabowo and his allies had triggered the May
riots. On July 23, Habibie formed the 18-member
TGPF to discover the "mastermind"
behind the disturbances in six major cities,
including Jakarta. After three months, the TGPF
concluded that the kidnappings, the economic
crisis, the MPR session, the demonstrations
and the Trisakti killings all "closely
correspond" to the riots.
The first of its nine recommendations was that
the government investigate the May 14 meeting
at Kostrad "to be able to find out the
role of Lt.-Gen. Prabowo and other parties in
the process which led to the riot." The
report did not name Prabowo as the riot's mastermind
in the executive summary released to the media.
But it referred to him, to the May 14 meeting
and to the abductions a total of 11 times. That
was more than Syafrie, who received four references,
or Wiranto, at that time still defense minister
and armed forces chief. Wiranto was mentioned
only once - in the context of co-signing the
decree that brought the TGPF into existence.
Prabowo lashes out at the report's insinuations.
"What was the motivation that we were going
to instigate riots?" he asks. "Our
interest is if the government survives. I'm
part of the Suharto regime. If Pak Harto survived
another three years, I might make four-star
general. Why should I burn the capital? It's
against my vested interest, let alone my principles."
He faults the report's logic. "How can
I have a meeting on the 14th?" he says.
"The riots were starting on the 13th. And
these were so-called opponents of the New Order
meeting me."
He rebuts the impression that he is anti-Chinese.
He says that, like many Indonesians, he does
not think it is healthy for a minority to control
most of the economy. "Chinese businessmen
thought I wanted to get rid of them. But my
model was Malaysia's New Economic Policy."
Does that mean he would not start riots to teach
the ethnic Chinese a lesson? "Say you don't
believe I have any humanitarian feeling,"
he argues. "If we destroy the Chinese,
our economy becomes destroyed. It's like killing
yourself . . . If I did start the riots, why
am I not indicted? The burden of proof is on
the accusers."
To find that proof, I returned to the work
of the TGPF. I pored over a copy of the full
six-volume report. (Only the first volume, the
executive summary, had been made available to
the press.) Four of the five remaining volumes
consist of casualty and damage reports, eyewitness
accounts of riots and rapes, and attempts to
detect patterns. One volume contains transcripts
of interviews conducted with military officers
in charge during the riots. In addition, I spoke
to nine of the TGPF's 18 members, as well as
historian Hermawan Sulistiyo, who headed a separate
12-member team that did much of the legwork.
Were the riots organized? Many who reported
to the team believe so, but nowhere in the six
volumes is there evidence to back up the eyewitness
accounts, much less point to any one person
behind the unrest. The riot's nature remains
an open question. That leaves the May 14 meeting.
Yet when I spoke to three of those who attended,
including TGPF member Bambang Widjoyanto, all
denied any connection between them and the rioting,
as a number of its participants also did in
a press conference the day after the TGPF report
was made public. The picture they painted corresponds
to Prabowo's account.
So did the Kostrad chief allow the riots to
rage out of control? That would be difficult
for him to do, because at no time did he have
authority. Under standard procedures, the city
police chief handles security. Command goes
over to the garrison if police cannot maintain
law and order, a fact that police chief Maj.-Gen.
Hamami Nata pointed out to the TGPF on Aug.
28, 1998, and which was confirmed by Syafrie.
The former Jakarta garrison chief fixed the
time when command was transferred: around noon
on the 14th. Mobs had begun attacking police
posts, so police were withdrawn for their safety.
From the 14th onward, Syafrie took charge; by
the 15th, the unrest had largely been put out.
Syafrie flatly denies that Prabowo had any control
over him. "Prabowo has never influenced
me," says Syafrie. "He is my friend,
but I have the principles of my duty."
At the time, in fact, Syafrie's commanding officer
was Wiranto.
The release of the TGPF report was delayed
to Nov. 3 because of deep infighting within
the commission. "The situation was very
political," admits TGPF member Nursyahbani
Katjasungkana. "Opinions had already been
formed. Then in the process of compiling facts,
it was difficult to distinguish sharply between
fact and opinion." Debates became bogged
down in splits between civilian and military
members, between those who wanted to limit findings
to legally admissible evidence and those who
wanted to describe what they called "social
facts." An explosive point of contention:
the number of rape victims. Sulistiyo says that
out of 109 reported cases, his team was able
to verify only 14. But some on the commission
- who had encountered reported rapes themselves
- felt that that number had to be higher. The
count that appeared in the final report was
66 verified rapes, plus another 19 victims of
sexual harassment and violence.
The transcript of the testimonies delivered
by Prabowo and Syafrie to the TGPF of their
activities between May 12 and 14 contains no
information different from what they told me
almost 20 months later. Nearly all the TGPF
members I met denied that there had been any
outside attempt to influence the investigation.
Some said they were not affected by their own
prejudices, or the rumors linking Prabowo to
the riots.
Yet on Oct. 12, 1998, the TGPF summoned army
chief Subagyo purely in his capacity as head
of the military honor council investigating
Prabowo. In the transcript, the members questioning
Subagyo looked for a link between the disappearances
of four youths at the height of the riots to
the earlier kidnapping of activists. But Subagyo,
at least on record, could provide none. In the
final report, a link was still drawn between
Prabowo's pre-May kidnappings and the rioting.
Munir, head of the Commission on Missing Persons
and Victims of Violence (KONTRAS), does not
see the connection. "In May, I see a movement
inside the elite to push the political situation
to change," he says. "This differs
from the kidnappings, which is a conspiracy
to defend [the system]." One TGPF member,
I Made Gelgel, now acknowledges this problem
of interpretation. "It doesn't make sense,"
he says. "That on the one hand Prabowo
would fortify his father-in-law's power, and
on the other hand foment riots."
Halaman 1 | 2
| 3